• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Atonement
    • The Atonement: Read this first!
    • Confession of an ex-u0022Highperu0022 Calvinist
    • Revisiting the Substitutionary Atonement
    • Discussing the Atonement – a lot!
    • Lecture Notes on The Atonement
  • Sermons
  • ReviewsAll book and movie reviews
    • Books
    • Movies

ResponsiveReiding

  • Free grace?

    March 1st, 2024

    From Matthew 20:17-19 / Free Grace?

    At first glance, these 3 verses seem like an abrupt and inconsistent insertion. From 19:16-20:16, Matthew has recorded an extensive exposition of grace. How salvation is all of grace, and why it needs to be so. But he is not done.

    Now, as Jesus sets His face to go up to Jerusalem He deliberately takes the 12 aside to address what will happen there. He will be delivered over to the chief priests and scribes. He will be condemned to death. He will be delivered over to the Gentiles. He will be mocked. He will be flogged. He will be crucified. And He will rise again on the third day.

    What is this all about?

    2 things.

    1 – While grace is free to the recipient, it is horrifically costly to the Giver. The term “free grace” is a bit of a misnomer. It cost us nothing to receive it. But look at what it cost our Savior to grant it. We must never let go of this reality. Salvation is not a blithe “Ollie, Ollie, Oxen free” on the part of God.

    As has been quoted several times before – John Flavel writes: “  It is a special consideration to enhance the love of God in giving Christ, that in giving him he gave the richest jewel in his cabinet; a mercy of the greatest worth, and most inestimable value, Heaven itself is not so valuable and precious as Christ is: He is the better half of heaven; and so the saints account him, Psal. 73:25. “Whom have I in heaven but thee?” Ten thousand thousand worlds, saith one,* as many worlds as angels can number, and then as a new world of angels can multiply, would not all be the bulk of a balance, to weigh Christ’s excellency, love, and sweetness. O what a fair One! what an only One! what an excellent, lovely, ravishing One, is Christ! Put the beauty of ten thousand paradises, like the garden of Eden, into one; put all trees, all flowers, all smells, all colours, all tastes, all joys, all sweetness, all loveliness in one; O what a fair and excellent thing would that be? And yet it should be less to that fair and dearest well-beloved Christ, than one drop of rain to the whole seas, rivers, lakes, and fountains of ten thousand earths. Christ is heaven’s wonder, and earth’s wonder.

    Now, for God to bestow the mercy of mercies, the most precious thing in heaven or earth, upon poor sinners; and, as great, as lovely, as excellent as his Son was, yet not to account him too good to bestow upon us, what manner of love is this!1 1 Flavel, John. 1820. The Whole Works of the Reverend John Flavel. Vol. 1. London; Edinburgh; Dublin: W. Baynes and Son; Waugh and Innes; M. Keene.

    But not only is He bestowed upon us as Heaven’s treasure – He does so at the expense of the Cross.

    Oh what a Savior!

    2 – He will also rise again! For free grace to be full, He must not only die in the sinner’s place – He must be raised up again for our justification. Forgiveness of sin is only 1/2 of the equation. It is one thing to be found “not guilty” in a court of law, but quite another to be pronounced righteous. And in the case of Believers, righteous with the very righteousness of Christ Himself.

    So it is Paul will write by the Spirit: Phil 3:7-11 “But whatever gain I had, I counted as loss for the sake of Christ. Indeed, I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things and count them as rubbish, in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith— that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, that by any means possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead.”

    Dear Christian, God in Christ has not merely forgiven you your sins, but imputed to you the righteousness of His own dear Son, that you may obtain the fullness of the inheritance belonging to the Firstborn.

    Grace, upon grace, upon grace, upon grace!

    Hallelujah!

  • The Justness of Grace

    February 29th, 2024

    From Matthew 20:1-16 / The Justness of Grace

    It is important here to disregard the unfortunate chapter break. Jesus is not done the great theme of salvation by grace alone occasioned by the rich man’s inquiry in previous chapter. Because this is of such massive importance, Jesus is going to go on and show how it is grace is not somehow unjust, and, to reveal how the pride of the human heart inherently hates the idea of grace, especially when shown to others. These 16 verses are virtually an exposition of 19:30. How and why it is many who are first will be last, and the last first.

    Note first: There can be little doubt the figure here has to do first and foremost with the jealousy of the Jews once they see the Gentiles brought in, and that, without having had to serve under the yoke of the Law.

    What grace we Gentile believers receive! Our Jewish brethren have borne the heat of the day. They have labored so much longer. But He has called us near the end of the day, and magnified His grace in granting to us the very same eternal life which He has promised to all who have heard His call and responded. Grace, marvelous grace.

    In the private devotions of Lancelot Andrewes, he marvels on God’s “munificence”: God’s “giving the reward of a day for the toil of an hour.” Lancelot Andrewes, The Private Devotions of Dr. Lancelot Andrewes, Part II (trans. John Mason Neale; A New Edition.; Oxford; London: John Henry and James Parker, 1865), 51.

    Casting it in the light of Jesus’ words to the repentant thief on the Cross – and promising “Today shall you be with me in Paradise” – he writes: (paraphrase) how it is He – Gives sight to the blind, Looses the bound, Clothes the naked, Raises the fallen, Upholds the falling, Heals the sick, Gathers the dispersed, Feeds the living, Sustains the faint, Quickens the dead, Casts down the proud, Sets up the humble, Redeems the captives, Helping in the time of need. “Who is like unto Thee, O Lord, among the Gods? Glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing wonders?”

    And what is the chief among His wonders? Salvation for His enemies on the basis of pure grace and grace alone. Wonder of all wonders indeed!

    Note second: How anti-grace still lurks in our hearts. For who among us does not recoil at the thought of a Hitler or a Pol Pot sharing the eternal rewards of an Apostle Paul should they have confessed their sins and turned to Christ by faith in their final moments?

    Grace is actually repugnant to remnants of our sinful selves. The truth is, we often want justice for those we despise, while all the while claiming grace for ourselves. But Jesus is going to expose our hearts to us, and why it is we ALL need, grace. Because sin still abides within us. Some sense of personal merit invades even the most righteous when viewed against the backdrop of such an illustration. Surely, others who have not walked with Christ for decades are not to receive the same as ourselves?

    This is not to negate the reality that there will be varying rewards in the Heavenlies, though we are given precious little insight into what that will look like. Passages like 1 Cor. 3 certainly give us a hint as to the reality of it. But when all is said and done, if we would be champions of the Gospel of grace, we must needs divest ourselves of any thoughts of deserving anything from the hand of God more than what He has promised to all who obey the call to come and follow Him, irrespective of how long or how well they may have done. Sinful legalism still raises its ugly head within us when we begin to compare ourselves with others.

    Note third: The crowning concept in all of this is unambiguously placed before us in vs. 15. As the sovereign God over all people and all things – including salvation – He is allowed to do what He chooses with His riches in glory. To bestow, or withhold, to lavish and to mete out as He delights. Period. And, who are we, any of us, no matter what the conditions, to begrudge Him His delight to be generous as He sees fit?

    How poorly we truly grasp grace.

    Personal note: When I was a young man, I had a job with a large bank. One day, my boss came to me and said she was planning to promote me to an inside job (I was a courier at present), and to give me a substantial raise. One thing though was necessary to bring this change about. She needed to hire a replacement for me. And, I would need to train this replacement before I could take my new station.

    Before long, the new hire was brought on board and we had about 2 weeks together to prepare him to take my place. I liked him a lot and thought he would do well.

    Near the end of our time together, the new hire, Bruce, remarked to me how much he enjoyed the job, congratulated me on my promotion, and in passing mentioned how he could not believe he was being paid so well for this position. He let slip his salary. And much to my shock, dismay and great resentment, he was contracted to be paid more than I was about to receive given both my promotion and raise. I was seething with anger.

    I made my anger at the situation well known to my boss. With my self-justified deep resentment, I refused to take care of an emergency situation over a holiday. She had to go in instead. The next work day I received a written reprimand for my insubordination, while fuming back my justification for having been wronged in the whole affair.

    As I recall and Providence would have it, shortly after my pastor preached on this very text. My heart was struck and I was deeply convicted. Had I not gladly contracted with my employer to step into my new role at my new rate of pay? Indeed. And had Bruce contracted with my employer for something other? Indeed. And did not my employer have the right to pay Bruce what she determined for him doing my old job and me doing the new job? Indeed. Was any wrong doe to me? No.

    It was then that the power of this passage struck me through such a temporal experience.

    The problem was, I had already resigned my job in anger and moved on. The Spirit, in His precious ministrations prodded my heart until months later, I called my old boss and asked to met. She graciously agreed. And there I told her how wrong I had been in my attitude. I shared with her the way the truth of this passage had been unfolded to me by my Pastor, asked her forgiveness, and it became the platform to share the Gospel with her.

    I thought little about it all through the years, except when coming again to this passage. That is, until about 10 years later, when through another friend, I found out my former boss and her husband had both since come to Christ, not long before she was diagnosed with cancer and passed away.

    And to this day, all I can do is rejoice in grace, grace, marvelous grace. Grace that exceeds, my sin and my guilt. Yonder and Calvary’s mount outpoured, There where the blood of the Lamb was spilt.

  • Threading The Needle

    February 27th, 2024

    From Matthew 19:23-30 / Threading The Needle

    An awful lot of ink has been spilled on this passage – along with the portion above. Some have used it to prove that wealth itself is sin. Others, focus on trying to dismiss the “camel through the eye of a needle” imagery.” Perhaps so as to make it seem not easy, but still doable. Both in my opinion miss the chief points. Jesus was indeed appealing to something impossible, not merely difficult. Impossible.

    Note the first application: This entire scenario from vs 16 all the way through 30, has nothing to do with the quantity of money or goods one may possess. Monetarily wealthy people are no less salvable than anyone else. Nor are the poor more salvable. The issue, as with the man in the story, focuses on the problem of whatever we find too valuable in our eyes to part with that we might have Christ is what we think makes us “rich”. Whatever, or whoever, we cannot do without – if it in any way hinders our following after Him – that is what will keep us out of Heaven. In the words of the commercial “What (or who) is in your wallet?” come to mind?

    In the final analysis, we each have our own currency. We each have those things which are most dear to us. People, things, reputation, ease, self-image, accolades, accomplishments, you name it. We are put to the mettle when we are put in the position of – when push comes to shove – what to me is more valuable than following wholeheartedly after Christ?

    Note the second application: Who is the rich person here? The one who thinks he has it all already. And therefore, he can give nothing up. The rich man wanted to do, not to not do.

    This man thought he had something he could bring to the table to make him acceptable before God. The wealth he at first brought to the table was his obedience to the Law. And herein surfaces a theological problem which must be carefully examined.

    Many, even solid evangelical men throughout history, building off of a skewed understanding of Adam’s circumstance in the Garden, postulate that had Adam continued in obedience, he would have warranted eternal life for himself and his posterity. However, the Scripture itself makes no such intimation. Without more data, the best we can surmise is that he would have remained as he was indefinitely. Why? For the same reason the man in our text errs. Because obedience is simply our duty. It earns us nothing. Even if one were to keep the Mosaic Law perfectly in heart and mind from the day of their conception – they would not have earned a thing. New York State has yet to send me reward checks for never driving over the speed limit. It is only what is expected.

    Jesus Himself will clarify this principle in a simile He uses in Luke 17:7-10 – “Will any one of you who has a servant plowing or keeping sheep say to him when he has come in from the field, ‘Come at once and recline at table’? Will he not rather say to him, ‘Prepare supper for me, and dress properly, and serve me while I eat and drink, and afterward you will eat and drink’? Does he thank the servant because he did what was commanded? So you also, when you have done all that you were commanded, say, ‘We are unworthy servants; we have only done what was our duty.’ ”

    Given the two considerations above, we are left with the same questions as the Disciples: “Who then can be saved?” And Jesus answers it point blank: “With man this is impossible.”

    If one cannot BE as good as God, and one cannot contribute anything above what is only our duty – how is it possible for anyone to inherit eternal life?

    And Jesus’ answer? “with God all things are possible.”

    Through the Cross. Through faith granted to the soul – faith in the saving, substitutionary atoning sacrifice on Calvary – God does the impossible, and saves us. Grants us an inheritance: “to an inheritance that is imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, who by God’s power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. In this you rejoice, though now for a little while, if necessary, you have been grieved by various trials, so that the tested genuineness of your faith—more precious than gold that perishes though it is tested by fire—may be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the revelation of Jesus Christ. Though you have not seen him, you love him. Though you do not now see him, you believe in him and rejoice with joy that is inexpressible and filled with glory, obtaining the outcome of your faith, the salvation of your souls.” (1 Peter 1:4-9)

    Hallelujah!

  • The Missing Piece

    February 26th, 2024

    From Matthew 19:16-22 / The Missing Piece

    There is so very much to consider in this well known scene. Mark points out the effusive use of “good teacher” in his Gospel. An approach which would have been considered over the top in his day. Luke condenses the account to embrace and focus on what we have here in vss. 23-30. But what is central to all three accounts is this: How it is Jesus must restate the question in order to get to the real issue at hand. You ask me about WHAT is good. The question is not “what” is good, but “WHOM” is good. You cannot DO something good enough, you must BE good, the way God is – perfectly and in Himself. That is not a question of acts but of nature.

    Jesus does not introduce some new, lower standard than has always been the case. The standard of goodness always has been and still is – God Himself. To obtain eternal life by one’s own good works, would require one’s goodness to rise to the level of God’s own. No wonder “with man this is impossible.” v-26

    You are not good, so how can you do some good work which will give you eternal life. It is the wrong question. What you need to do is go back to see your inability to keep even the Law, let alone some superlative work which would bestow the Kingdom on you.

    John Newton writes: “Yet one thing, we read, was [lacking]. What could this one thing be, which rendered so fair a character of no value? We may collect it from the event. He [lacked] a deep sense of his need of a Saviour. If he had been possessed of this one thing, he would willingly have relinquished all to follow Jesus. But ignorant of the spirituality of the law, he trusted to a defective obedience; and the love of the world prevailing in his heart, he chose rather to part with Christ than with his possessions.”

    Note second, how this raises another vital question: So how can I BE good like God, so as to have eternal life? And this is where the Gospel is such good news; only by the imputed righteousness of Christ.

    In vs. 19, it is the last of the mere commandments toward men that Jesus is about to press upon him. The Ruler believes he has done all the Law requires. But under examination, it is clear he has not – for he does not love his neighbor as himself, else giving all to his neighbor would only be like giving to himself. Here is where the Law will expose Him. Nor did he love God supremely, or the promise of Heaven, of being eternally with God and in His manifest presence would be worth everything. No, he had NOT done all these from his youth up. Our human pride deludes us so.

    So it is in vs. 20, he is about to have his eyes opened – for he has fooled his own heart into thinking he has kept the law in regard to his neighbor. His question betrays two things:

    a. His blind sense of his own sin. He imagines himself already righteous to God’s standard.

    b. His belief that he can do something over and above the righteousness of God to obligate God to give him eternal life. That eternal life can be bought, and that it is not given as a gift of grace to sinners.

    Note third: And slightly different (yet allied) to Newton’s statement – What did he still lack?

    And the answer is – Faith. You will not believe that following me is worth the loss of everything else, even when I, the Son of Man, tell it to you face to face.

    In 21, Jesus reveals his heart to him. Really, if you think you’ve actually done these, then let me show you what that would really look like, for you cannot truly love your neighbor as yourself until you’ve done everything you can to follow me in abandon and to pursue the kingdom to come in faith. You think you’ve kept the second portion of the Law as concerns love to neighbor, how about the first – love to God supremely? Do you recognize me as God, and that to love me supremely, above all you have is also required? Apparently not.

    But if you really want to be perfect, you will have to have the heart and mind of God. He cares nothing for anything the World views as precious. His heart is one which will give all to those who have nothing.

    Note fourth: The baseline argument is – Do what I have done. I have left all of Heaven. I have come in the likeness of sinful man. I have made myself poor so that others may be rich. I have forsaken all, that I may follow the Father’s will – trusting that what is before me, is worth it all. “For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that you by his poverty might become rich.” 2 Cor. 8:9

    Note fifth: Sadly, tragically, in 22, the man goes away – apparently befuddled, and clearly unable to fulfill the law he already claimed to have kept from his youth up. He wanted God on his own terms – not on God’s. He would do ANYTHING, except believe he was a sinner in need of grace.

    So it is with all who will not come needy, but who come supposing themselves to be rich toward God in their own righteousness (24). Until they give that up, it is impossible for them to be saved (26).

    Note lastly: How Jesus confronts this man, is not to be universally applied as though none can follow Christ if they have earthly wealth. It is only if such wealth keeps them from trusting in Him alone for right standing with God.

    In the Jewish mindset of the day, this made no sense. As the Old Covenant often placed material prosperity as a sign that one was “blessed” by God, favored, how can it be that one who has all the signs of God’s favor can still be far from eternal life? In this, many erred having believed that God’s outward covenantal blessings were ends in themselves, and not types and shadows of the real wealth of truly knowing and walking with God. Having made the Mosaic covenant an end in itself, they missed the reality of what it was pointing to.

    Many even now, apart from the the Sinaiatic covenant, assume that earthly possessions and comforts means God is pleased with them as they are. They will even say “I am blessed.” And indeed they are. But being outwardly blessed is not the same as being in right standing with God. It only makes them responsible to steward those blessings for Christ’s Kingdom.

    or, if in keeping their wealth, they must give themselves over to sin in protecting, growing and using their wealth. Abraham was rich. Job was rich. Solomon was rich. This state does not automatically condemn a man. But it is a state with its own very real and very treacherous pitfalls. Hence the prayer of Prov. 30:8 & 9 – “give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with the food that is needful for me, lest I be full and deny you and say, “Who is the LORD?” or lest I be poor and steal and profane the name of my God.” Each state has its attendant snares.

  • Christ’s Bodyguards

    February 2nd, 2024

    From Matthew 19:13-15 / Christ’s Bodyguards

    The lesson from this simple passage is sweet, and necessary: Don’t fence God. He needs no body guards.

    Note first: Christians need not be God’s protectors as many in Islam violently protect Mohamed. When our God needs defending by us rather than we needing defending by Him – things are upside down. Ultimately, it is the product of human hubris – even though it may flow from a personal sense of reverence.

    It is true we are to pray and work for the fame of the name of God to be restored; for the whole of sentient creation to hallow, revere, respect and honor Him for who and what He is. When Jesus taught us to pray, He put this issue as the very first among all things we are to pray for. Nothing was dearer to His own heart than to see His Father’s reputation restored. To see all love and cherish and delight in the Father as He Himself did. But that is not done by swatting down those we think deficient, unworthy or even blasphemous. It is done by trusting Him, praising His name, walking in such a way as to reveal His character, preaching His Gospel and walking in truth.

    He is our great defender, we are not His.

    Note second: There are none more worthy than others to seek Him than others.

    Young, old, hale, infirm, educated, ignorant, accomplished, indigent, intellectual or challenged. He came to seek and save “the lost”, not humanly created sub-sets of humanity.

    Jonathan Edwards recounts the case of Phebe Bartlet who at the age of 4 began to manifest evidences of the Spirit moving in her soul. By 5 she was truly remarkable in her pursuit of God. John the Baptizer was filled with the Spirit even in his mother’s womb. And I can add that of myself, having my eyes opened to my sinfulness before God, and my heart opened to embrace Christ and the Cross at the age of 8.

    When people show any interest in spiritual matters, we need to take it seriously. This is especially true with children, who do not take such an interest at all naturally.

    Note third: How quick Jesus was always ready to bless.

    And should we imagine Him any different today? Were these children displaying some interest in Him themselves, or was it only that their parents sought something on their behalf – He loves to receive and bless. Here, it says they specifically wanted Him to pray for these little ones. To speak to the Father on their behalf.

    What an encouragement then for parents today to seek Christ that He might intercede on behalf of our children, grandchildren and others. In this, we never see a refusal. Instead, we see Him admonishing any who would hinder it.

    Be encouraged to seek Him for your loved ones. He is far more gracious and ready and willing than we dare believe.

    Hallelujah!

  • The Non-Sin of Singleness

    February 1st, 2024

    From Matthew 19:10-12 / The Non-Sin of Singleness

    A key to understanding this short section has to do with prevailing Jewish thought on two fronts.

    First off, we have to note that divorce had become fairly rampant in society. No doubt there are several contributing factors. Being that the Jews were under Roman occupation for quite some time, the permissiveness of Roman culture in this regarding divorce and remarriage, certainly had an impact on the general populace. They were used to seeing this behavior in their own leadership.

    Herod the Great was the King of Judea (a Jew but under the Roman power) was in power when Jesus was born. He had 10 wives total. Some murdered, some divorced. But getting out of one marriage into another was a way of life. He considered himself a pious Jew. After all, it was he who built the magnificent Temple in Jerusalem where Jesus went frequently. And it was his son Herod Antipas who divorced his first wife to marry the wife of his half-brother – Herodias – who had John the Baptizer also murdered.

    So divorce and remarriage couldn’t be all that bad could it? Since the Jewish political leaders were fine with it, why not everybody?

    The second factor was that it was considered a duty for a Jewish man to be married. One commentator noted that is a young man reached the age of 16 and had no marriage prospects locked in, the elders of the Synagogue might call him in and find out what the matter was.

    In that kind of an environment, if a man in fact did get divorced, it would be shameful to remain single.

    Now you can see why the Disciples were a bit incredulous at Jesus’ statements. If a man can only divorce and then remarry under such narrow parameters, maybe it is best not to get married at all!

    “But” Jesus says, singleness is not something to be entered into any less seriously than marriage. And here, He breaks with both major Jewish schools, and with a prominent sub-sect – the Essenes, who connected celibacy with a higher spiritual state. Once again, He doesn’t make anyone happy on any side of the equation. He neither condemns nor pushes singleness. What He does do is call each to live righteously before God, given our freedoms, and providential parameters.

    Providentially, there may be some who are born in a condition (physically) where fulfilling the requirements of marital intimacy would not be possible. In such a case, there is a forced singleness. It would be the responsibility for such a one to live within those parameters righteously before God. And no doubt, special grace is extended to such as they seek how to live well before the Father.

    Second, there may be those who through accident (perhaps in war) or more likely, by virtue of having been castrated as slaves, in order to serve in court positions to attend royal women – would too find that Providence had precluded marriage as an option. They too would need to seek for grace to remain pure in such forced singleness. Under this umbrella, one might consider a spouse who has become impotent or unable due to disease, accident or some other condition. This form of “singleness” (in this one regard) would require special grace.

    And third, there are some who have been given a gift of not needing marital intimacy, and are able then to devote extra time and effort to serving the Kingdom. They have received another kind of special grace.

    When all is said and done, Jesus’ teaching leaves us here:

    1 – The norm is marriage, and marriage for life. Let us seek to serve Him within the bounds lovingly and wisely set for such a union. Seeking sexual satisfaction from anyone else other than one’s spouse, is grave sin.

    2 – Some remain single for various reasons. There is no shame in not being married. And for some, an actual advantage.

    3 – In both – we seek grace from the Lord to live righteously within the limits of His Providence. And He gives it. Let each receive as they are enabled. No providence excuses sin. Each context will find us needing to depend fully upon Him.

    Contentment with God’s Providences is one of the most difficult spiritual lessons the Christian needs to learn.

    But how gracious He is to provide for us in the gift of His indwelling Spirit.

  • D.I.V.O.R.C.E.

    January 31st, 2024

    From Matthew 19:3-9 / D.I.V.O.R.C.E.

    The Pharisees seemed to have endless energy when it came to testing Jesus. One lexicon says that the word “tested” here means: “to obtain information to be used against a person by trying to cause someone to make a mistake—‘to try to trap, to attempt to catch in a mistake.’ Louw, Johannes P., and Eugene Albert Nida. 1996. In Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains, electronic ed. of the 2nd edition., 1:329. New York: United Bible Societies.

    The point is that they wanted to prove Jesus to be a fraud, to dissuade people from buying into Him. Perhaps this is because their popularity among the common folk would be eroded if they began to put stock in one who did not agree with the Pharisaical constructs. Perhaps it was that they could not abide anyone who did not support them or hold to every jot and tittle of their interpretations and practices. Perhaps both mixed with other motives as well.

    Mind you, the Pharisees took the Bible seriously. They were zealous in serving God as they understood Him and His demands. But in their zeal, they became the biggest practitioners of the “Cancel Culture” of their day. Every disagreement, no matter how small, was a deal breaker for fellowship. Sadly, like so many today. Jesus didn’t fit neatly enough. So He had to be unmasked for the diabolical infiltrator He was. He had to go. So exposing Him publicly as not towing the orthodox line was a necessary tactic.

    The problem was, their orthodoxy had features which were not central to Biblical truth, but was more reliant on their interpretations of certain things. Whether or not those were central to Biblical Yaweh worship took second place. If it didn’t fit their entire cast, it was not just suspect, it was evil and needed to be excised.

    Sound familiar?

    It is still true in politics. And it is still true in much of Evangelical Christianity. Much to our shame.

    Note first: The most probable background for the question had to do with a debate between two schools of Biblical thought in that day. One school taught that a man could divorce his wife for things as trivial as burning his toast once too often. The other school, the “conservative” school, thought divorce could only be on the grounds of really serious sin. Of course defining such sin was open to discussion as well. All of this grew out of debate over the guidelines for divorce in Deut. 24.

    Jesus was not about to make either side happy.

    Why? Because His answer goes beyond questions of merely obeying some letter of the Law. He wants to take them back to consider the question – and all such questions – in terms of their principial foundations. When that is done, quick and easy answers to complex questions disappear. Note second: Jesus makes it clear that marriage is not simply a social contract. In it, God causes the two to be joined in a mysterious way which is meant to demonstrate the nature of Christ and His Church. So it cannot be dissolved easily and without due consideration for what else is involved. God has acted in it, not just the two people married. And no one ought to presume to sever what God has divinely brought into union before His eyes and for His purposes. This is a very high matter. More than man’s reasons and desires need to be dealt with.

    Flippant reasons often given like: “We’ve just grown apart”, or, “we made a mistake”; “we were too young”; “I need to do this for me”; “He, or she doesn’t meet my needs”; or worst of all, “I’ve fallen in love with someone else” – don’t cut it.

    Divorce is meant to complicated. God determined it so when He gave the Mosaic Law. Marriage, divorce and re-marriage are not issues where one just ticks off the right boxes. It has cosmic implications.

    Note third: As was the issue with the Pharisees approach to the Sabbath, something is always amiss when we are called to serve what was meant to serve and bless us. The Sabbath as Jesus says in correcting their view, was made for man, not man for the sabbath.

    So it is with marriage. Marriage was meant to bless and contribute to the flourishing of man. Man was not meant to serve marriage. When this is upside down, the institution takes on more importance than the people the institution is meant to bless.

    Note fourth: Central to understanding Jesus’ words here, is rightly understanding vss. 8-9, which sadly have been greatly misunderstood by many.

    Some interpret these verse so as to say God granted divorce to Israel to accommodate the sinful desires of some. This would be most strange indeed. It would be as though one said: “I am a serial rapist and cannot control myself due to the hardness of my heart”, and God replies: “I will make a law then that serial rapists are not to be charged for their sin, after all, it is due to the hardness of their hearts.” At once we see the folly of such an interpretation.

    The sense is this: Because there are some, whose hardness of heart leads them to such an extreme that they would even violate the most basic, most sacred covenant of marriage – God gave to the innocent party a means of relief – that they might leave and be married to another who is faithful.

    Divorce is not license to the wicked, it is relief for the betrayed.

    Jesus is saying that the Law was not given to give those with hard hearts a pass, but rather to protect those injured and sinned against.

    Note fifth: It is true that there is no divorce without sin. It is not true that who are divorced have sinned. If in fact divorce itself IS sin in all cases, then God writing Israel a decree of divorce in Jer. 3:8 implicates Him in sin. We know this cannot be true. But what was behind God’s divorce? Spiritual adultery. And what is it Christ appeals to here in our text? The same. Adultery.

    Now it is obvious that the Bible has much more to say about the topic in a number of other places. But for Jesus’ purpose of refusing to be drawn into a war of interpretive niggling, and calling all parties to lift up our hearts and minds to see such matters on higher places indeed, He silences His prosecutors, and blesses His people.

    What a Savior.

  • Going Home

    January 30th, 2024

    From Matthew 19:1-2 / Going Home

    At first blush, these two verses seem exceedingly incidental. Really, why bother? But I think there is something still worth noting here.

    Note first: Back in 17:22, Jesus spoke – the most clearly to that point in time – about the immediate future. He said He was going to be delivered into the hands of men, killed, and then raised up three days later. This greatly distressed them the text says. But then the events of everyday life seem to push this revelation into the background. First there was the 2 drachma tax controversy, then the discussion over who was greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven. And this led to Jesus’ extended discourse on humility and forgiveness.

    And so it can be with us even now. The promises of Christ’s return, the resurrection, the new heavens and the new earth can easily be lost by us as having continuing importance in the ordering of our lives. As staggering as those realities are, they can be overshadowed by the stuff of everyday life. But not Jesus. He takes His sidestep to deal with the immediate, but as soon as He is finished with those, He is right back on track. He is still undeterred from His path to Jerusalem.

    And I wonder in myself, am I so mindful of my own path to the Celestial City? Am I a traveling partner with Bunyan’s Christian? Yes, many things require our attention from all sides each and every day. But are we on our way home? Or has that idea been pushed so far back in our minds that it no longer informs our thoughts, actions and decisions?

    Am I, are you – consciously proceeding toward Heaven? Is that our course? Are all other things dealt with, experienced and contexualized by where we are headed? For to lose sight of where we are going, is to wander aimlessly through life. And is this not behind the despair of so many – even professed Christians?

    Are we consciously going home to be with Jesus? And do we remain aware that the only way there is through the cross?

    Note second: No matter where Jesus is, or whatever else is going on, pouring our mercy and grace on others is never neglected.

    Large crowds were following Him. And He was neither deterred by them, nor unmindful of them.

    He might have been consumed in Himself with what was about to happen to Him. But no. Or, He might have been tempted to stop His journey to enjoy the attention of the crowds. But neither is true. He met them, and He continued on His way.

    Note third: His ministry to these crowds, is a ministry to a throng of the unnamed. The common folk. There are no mentions of the healing of notable people. No mention of class, station nor even the particulars of the healings. It is simply recorded that this is what He did. They, unmindful of what awaited Him, were simply desiring their needs to be met. And in typical Jesus fashion, He just blessed them. He gave them what He had without pomp, ceremony or self-reference.

    How sweet and how gracious and how willing to bless our Lord is.

    And if He is not too busy, too distracted, too fixed on the Cross to stop and heal this nameless crowd, then how much more is He ready to hear the prayers and meet the needs of His people from His place beside the Father even today.

    Oh Christian, come to Him with your needs.

    Oh lost one, come to Him with your sin.

    He is no further away than the cry of your heart .

  • To Enter Heaven, Heaven Must First Enter You

    January 29th, 2024

    Matthew 18:23-35 / To Enter Heaven, Heaven must first Enter You.

    Jesus is not done speaking about forgiveness. And in taking up this parable, elucidates not only the foundation upon which our forgiveness of one another rests, but also a crucial principle of The Kingdom.

    Note first: Jesus says the Kingdom bears a comparison to what He is about to disclose. This is not just a nice religious idea, it is in fact an aspect of the rule of God in His Kingdom. He establishes something of great importance here, and something not to be glossed over lightly.

    Note second: Important to see in this parable is that these are legitimate debts, not sins per se. Among people, it is one thing, with God, it takes on much more gravity. How much easier is it to forgive a simple debt, than to forgive true sin? But in Christ, God deals with both.

    Here the question arises, in what way is human sin to be likened to, or considered as a debt? Which answer is found in Romans 3:23 “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” We were made in His image. We were created to bear and display His glory, His perfections and holiness to the rest of creation. And in our sin, we have defrauded Him of what we owe – bearing His image and honoring Him as God; which is also our very great sin. It is not just THAT we sin, and thus fall short of His glory. It is also that in falling short of His glory – we sin our greatest sin. For we who were made to reveal Him, obscure, hide and distort His image. SO the rest of creation is robbed of seeing, knowing and worshiping Him, and He is robbed of the duty we owe to Him inherent in the very purpose of our creation. What a debt!

    Note Third: Now we must ask, what is it in comparison to what we owe God, do that we think others owe us – legitimately or not – and then fail to forgive when confronted? Respect? Deference? Recognition? Loyalty? And do we recognize their brokenness and inability to repay – and so turn a blind eye and a deaf ear and forgive freely? Father, give me that heart.

    Note fourth: The nature of our debt is such that it cannot be repayed. For even if we were to perfectly display His glory from this day forward, there is no way to go back and restore the days already lost. Time cannot be undone. We cannot recover those lost days. They are forever gone. Such is the reality in the figures Jesus uses.

    In His time, the servant owing 10,000 talents was something akin to 20 years wages. In modern dress, it would be something like a billion dollars or more. The point is that there is no way this debt could be repayed no matter how much patience the King might extend. Working another 20 years would only be earning what he ought to earn for those twenty – it would not make up for the loss.

    And so it is with our sin-debt.

    Note fifth: The announcement of the Gospel is, that forgiveness for this un-repayable debt is to be had for all who would come, humble themselves and plead for mercy. God is so lavish, so gracious, so merciful that “through this man forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you, and by him everyone who believes is freed from everything from which you could not be freed by the law of Moses.” (Acts 13:38-39). And that Jesus Himself said this is to be proclaimed to the world. What a wondrous Gospel it is we have to preach.

    Note sixth: Grace must bear fruit. If it does not, the grace extended is forfeited.

    The 17th Century English Divine authored the famous book “The Almost Christian Discovered.” John Wesley and George Whitefield would both go on to preach famous sermons by the same title. For the great danger is, that men can come under the realization of their great debt to God, and can believe that God forgives for Christ’s sake, and for a while walk in the elation of thinking their debt forgiven – who nonetheless, show that such mercy announced has made no real change to their nature. And reveling as they may in the thought of their being set free, still treat others as though there is no mercy or grace to be found at their hands.

    And what will end of such be? The free offer rescinded. And the final end, as though mercy had never been received at all.

    So it is Jesus closes the parable with His warning. Look and see. If grace extended has not wrought an inward change so as to become a vessel of grace to others, one can at last prove themselves to still be lost and undone. Like wicked Simon the Magician, who “believed” but was not changed. Who was baptized, but was never born again. Who heard the announcement of free grace, but sought to make merchandise of it to others. Who despite his profession at the time, proved to still be “in the gall of bitterness and in the bond of iniquity. Who heard the facts of the Gospel, and rejoiced in them for a time, but was never born again by the Spirit of God.

    Grace must bear fruit. If it does not, the grace received is forfeited. Like the seed which fell on rocky ground in Matt. 15. Something immediately sprang up. But with no depth of soil, what appeared withered just as quickly.

    Our God forgives easily, freely, generously. But where grace bears no fruit, sin will yet be punished to the full.

  • Three Strikes!

    January 26th, 2024

    From Matthew 18:21-22 / Three Strikes and You’re Out!

    Note first: The question here is regarding personal offenses. And as D.A. Carson notes, the Rabbinic teaching popular at the time was, you could (and should) for an offender personal sins 3 times. But on the fourth infraction – zippo. Done.

    Now, Peter, in a noble effort ups the ante. He more than doubles the quota. And herein lies a problem which underlies much theological error – quantifying spiritual things.

    This tendency, because we like neat and clean cutoff points, spills over into all sorts of places in the Christian life. How many chapters in the Bible should I read each day in order to be in good standing? How many Church services per month do I need to attend? What do I set the egg-timer on so that I am sure I pray just the right amount of time? How many times do I forgive those who sin against me so as to know I can tick the box off on my qualification form?

    You see the problem.

    Such thinking forms the foundation of legalism. It is proto-Phariseeism. It starts small and well meaning and maybe even subconsciously. But when it grows, it blossoms into full grown legalism. And this, from earnest Evangelicals.

    So it is Jesus uses a hyperbolic number to expose the wrong reasoning. It is not a matter of quantity, but one of the inner heart and mind ruled by the Spirit, and in light of the forgiveness we ourselves receive each and every day from our Lord and King.

    I remember a time in my own life when I had in fact been sinned against very greatly by a dearest friend. And my own hackles were raised to new heights. Anger and resentment grew daily. Revenge entered my heart.

    Then by grace, one day in reading the Word and prayer, the thought entered my mind – one I blush to say now should have been there all along, but had been obliterated by my sinful response: In truth, no one has ever sinned against me, as greatly as I have sinned against my God. And yet here I am, the beneficiary of His ceaseless mercy and grace.

    And in the moment, I was free.

    Free to forgive, even though the other party showed no signs of repentance.

    And what does that forgiveness look like? For me, it was going before the Lord, and pleading that nothing be laid to their charge before His throne on my account. Maybe I could not be reconciled to them because they did not want it. But I could ask the Father, that on the day of judgment, nothing related to me be charged to them. And, that in the intervening years, they would come to know Christ’s saving grace for themselves.

    And such an approach takes quantities out of the equation, even as Jesus does not deal with me in terms of quantity – but out of the overflow of His divine love, mercy and grace.

    Holy Spirit, make me like the Savior. And let me forgive out of the reservoir of cleansing His blood supplies. Where I can go and wash multiple times a day – and out of which I can then forgive others.

    Note second: A question remains: Does forgiveness end the matter entirely? And we must say – often not. Other issues may be involved. Criminality for instance. Or danger to others who may also become victims. Remedial chastisement.

    Our responsibility to the perpetrator and to the larger community must be considered. Forgiveness may not, in every case, simply end in dismissal and reconciliation. We must be in a perpetually forgiving frame. But that may not end the affair in and of itself.

    J. C. Ryle writes: “The rule here laid down must of course be interpreted with sober-minded qualification. Our Lord does not mean that offences against the law of the land and the good order of society, are to be passed over in silence. He does not mean that we are to allow people to commit thefts, and assaults, with impunity. All that He means is, that we are to study a general spirit of mercy and forgivingness towards our brethren. We are to bear much, and to put up with much, rather than quarrel. We are to look over much, and submit to much, rather than have any strife. We are to lay aside everything like malice, strife, revenge, and retaliation. Such feelings are only fit for heathens. They are utterly unworthy of a disciple of Christ.11 Ryle, J. C. 1860. Expository Thoughts on Matthew. New York: Robert Carter & Brothers.

    Note third: All of this is evidenced by the parable which follows. Forgiveness in that case did not lead to brokenness and genuine repentance. And so as the continued sin pattern spilled over to another, other action had to be taken and the “forgiveness” freely offered could not result in simply letting the matter go. It became apparent that remedial chastisement was also necessary – which looks as though forgiveness was rescinded, but was in fact further dealing with the offender in light of a wider circle of impact.

    And so as dear William Cowper penned:

    1 There is a fountain filled with blood

    Drawn from Immanuel’s veins;

    And sinners, plunged beneath that flood,

    Lose all their guilty stains:

    Lose all their guilty stains,

    Lose all their guilty stains;

    And sinners, plunged beneath that flood,

    Lose all their guilty stains.

    2 The dying thief rejoiced to see

    That fountain in his day;

    And there may I, though vile as he,

    Wash all my sins away:

    Wash all my sins away,

    Wash all my sins away;

    And there may I, though vile as he,

    Wash all my sins away.

    3 Dear dying Lamb, Thy precious blood

    Shall never lose its pow’r,

    Till all the ransomed Church of God

    Be saved, to sin no more:

    Be saved, to sin no more,

    Be saved, to sin no more;

    Till all the ransomed Church of God

    Be saved to sin no more.

    4 E’er since by faith I saw the stream

    Thy flowing wounds supply,

    Redeeming love has been my theme,

    And shall be till I die:

    And shall be till I die,

    And shall be till I die;

    Redeeming love has been my theme,

    And shall be till I die.

    5 When this poor lisping, stamm’ring tongue

    Lies silent in the grave,

    Then in a nobler, sweeter song

    I’ll sing Thy pow’r to save:

    I’ll sing Thy pow’r to save,

    I’ll sing Thy pow’r to save;

    then in a nobler, sweeter song

    I’ll sing Thy pow’r to save.

←Previous Page
1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 197
Next Page→

Blog at WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • ResponsiveReiding
      • Join 418 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • ResponsiveReiding
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar